Snark, Critic and Pop!

In our continuing feature on people marrying things, we come across the story of J.D. Hayworth who claims that Massachussetts law allowing for same sex couples to marry can be interpreted to say that a man can marry a horse.  No really, he said it:

“You see, the Massachusetts Supreme Court, when it started this move toward same-sex marriage, actually defined marriage — now get this — it defined marriage as simply, ‘the establishment of intimacy… Now how dangerous is that? I mean, I don’t mean to be absurd about it, but I guess I can make the point of absurdity with an absurd point — I guess that would mean if you really had affection for your horse, I guess you could marry your horse. It’s just the wrong way to go”

I totally agree.  Why marry the horse?  Why not date for awhile and see how things go.  Maybe get a place together, get a pet dog and treat it like you child.  You need to know if the horse will be a good father before you marry him.  And does the horse have a good job?  Is he loyal?  Will he love you forever?